“…take the sandwich out of her mouth and go for a goddamn fucking walkâ€: On Olivia Munn, Feminism, and Cultural Criticism
By Lesley | July 8, 2010
Prior to this week, I never really had an opinion in regard to Olivia Munn, late of G4’s Attack of the Show and currently working to earn a permanent role as a Daily Show correspondent. I’d heard her name before, mostly from my husband, who is both a gamer and an aspiring game journalist, and mostly in the context of gamer boys fairly universally finding Munn hot, as a conventionally-attractive female unlikely to give her boyfriend shit for playing video games, and even — GASP — playing those games herself.
This rationale made sense to me. Indeed, my first date with said husband involved plans to see a movie, plans that were rapidly scrapped when I arrived at his apartment to discover he had a Nintendo 64 and I independently decided we should stay there and order in dinner so I could play me some Mario. I have been informed since that my behavior that night earned me beaucoup potential-girlfriend points, though if I’m being honest, at the time I was far more interested in the video game than the dude. What can I say? I’d been living without a game console for three years.
Even conservative estimates seem to indicate that lady gamers represent a growing minority of the gaming population. The most popular statistic is that women make up 40% of all video-game players , and some studies specific to online gaming actually put women in the lead. You’d never know it, however, since gaming culture is nigh-universally spoken to and by men; this is changing, but female voices are still rare, and usually met with surprise, dismissal, or disdain (unless, of course, they are Hot). Many games themselves are often sexist and lacking in female characters with any depth beyond their cup size (of course, there are exceptions, I know, but I am generalizing for a reason). Since women only make up about 12% of the industry designing and producing these games (sometimes in horrifying circumstances) this is hardly surprising — men make games for men, and if women happen to play them, that’s okay, I guess, as long as they don’t expect us to change anything for them.
For the most part, women who participate in the games industry and in gaming culture do so in spite of the predominating maleness, which says something about women’s commitment to gaming. Of course, many of these women are also entirely capable of internalizing the prevailing misogyny. While at PAX East last March, I had the terrible misfortune of attending the “Girls & Games†panel, which purported to discuss the role of women in the industry, but quickly devolved into the panelists — all women — turning into misogyny apologists, avoiding the more difficult questions, many of them asked by men with a greater investment in feminism than the panel itself, with a shrugging “hey, stuff is sexist, get used to it, whatevs!†or responding to inquiries for advice on getting into the industry with useless “work hard and stay in school!†hokum. (At one point, one of the panelists even suggested that women were at fault for gender inequality in game production and design, for failing to “believe†in themselves enough. It was shortly after this comment that I walked out of the room in search of a palate-cleanser for THAT what-the-fuckery.)
All of this is to say that there is some degree of immediate camaraderie between lady gamers; we share some common ground, some common experiences, and I daresay we tend to want to support one another rather than tear one another down. Hence, my opinion on Olivia Munn, a woman working very publicly in a male-dominated industry, was apathetic with a seasoning of optimism — I’ve only seen her infrequently, but I want to support her because, frankly, we need more smart women in game culture.
This week, my opinion has changed — unfortunately — exclusively because of Munn’s own words. Bitch has a nice summation of the whole ordeal, but I will supply my own short version here. First Jezebel ran a post pointing out some problematic things Munn has said in interviews, and a couple weeks later, a post on what they termed The Daily Show’s “woman problem†— that is, their problem in hiring and keeping an equitable number of women on staff, which discussed Munn’s addition in a more diplomatic way. From here, there evolved an ongoing conversation about sexism and hiring practices and not-so-thinly-veiled suggestions that Munn’s hiring may have been as much about her being on the cover of Playboy as her comedic talents. Who knows? The Daily Show has asserted they had no idea of her dabblings in nudery, and that may well be true. But Munn herself has responded with some really problematic and — notably — unfunny comments of her own. We’ll start with this one:
“I never tried to use anything besides my own sweat and blood and talent to get somewhere. I think that anyone who’s out there trying to bring down why any woman would get anywhere, or why we’re different, just needs to fucking turn her fucking computer off, take the sandwich out of her mouth and go for a goddamn fucking walk. You know what? Just walk it off, bitch. Just walk it off, bitch.â€(Source) [Obscenities lovingly restored by yours truly.]
Cough. Well. Where to begin.
First, the idea that Munn’s having not intentionally exploited her appearance to get ahead somehow enables her to exist outside of a culture deeply embedded with sexism is disingenuous in the extreme. That, or she is wildly deluded about her own superhuman ability to shape reality. Whether Munn intended it or not, and whether she herself would prefer to succeed based exclusively on her talent or not, she lives and works in a culture that rewards conventional attractiveness. Simply saying “that’s crap!†doesn’t change it. Fucking hell, I wish it did. Arguing that Munn’s appearance may have been a factor does not automatically imply that Munn herself is untalented. It simply means her success is affected by several intersecting influences.
Secondly, Munn’s final words here are a buffet of misogyny, complete with a large slice of “bitch†for dessert. Are we really going down the path of shaming women for thinking critically, and writing about it — for being brainy and speaking their minds? And then, as if that weren’t enough, shaming them for eating food? Shut up, stop eating, and go outside; that sounds oddly familiar. I just can’t put my finger on it.
What’s more:
“We’re all human beings in this world,†she continued. “We’re all trying to make it from point A to point B, and just trying to fucking make it. So I think it’s really a disservice to all women when there are women out there who try to compartmentalize us as human beings, saying ‘women’ and ‘men,’ because I’m just out there.†(Source)
Okay, I LOLed. Yes, it’s feminists who insist upon “compartmentalizing†people into gender roles. You’ve got me. No, really, tell me another.
It’s almost a relief, really, to reach this level of absurdity. Does Munn really truly believe her gender has nothing to do with her success? Was it just coincidence that Playboy wanted her on their cover? I suppose the trauma of that photoshoot — no equivocation here — and the subsequent trauma of the photoshoot for her book cover, had absolutely nothing to do with her being female? Sure, Playboy pulls that take-your-clothes-off shit with men all the time. Munn is doing a bang-up job of discrediting her own arguments, such that there’s not much else for me to say.
Sara Reihani explains, in her Bitch post:
…[I]n the interview with Salon, Munn says “these women [Jezebel bloggers] sit behind this very thin veil that I can see right through, this idea that ‘we stand up for women.’ If you stand up for women, then don’t bash me.” This quote reveals a strict adherence to what I’ll call the Palin Feminist Fallacy: the idea that if a woman does something, it is automatically a feminist action. Being “okay” with a sexist remark doesn’t mean that it’s automatically no longer sexist, and being a female who makes misogynistic jokes doesn’t somehow cancel out the misogyny.
Indeed. Oh wait, you want more?
…[A] rather unflattering image of Munn has emerged from the kerbloffle… Frankly, she seems like kind of an asshole, or at best, an ignorant person who says ignorant things. She really likes one of the most popular corollaries to the Palin Feminist Fallacy: My Gay Friend, also known as I Know Black People, which goes like this: “I’m allowed to make racist/homophobic jokes because I have a friend of that minority.” Munn told the Daily Beast that “[…] See, I date different guys of different religions and races so I can always make the joke. I date the blacks, I date the Mexicans. I date ‘em all for comedy. You can’t buy that kind of gold. Having sex with a guy once is worth it.”
Yeah, uh, I think that’s enough.
I’ve said before, in numerous spaces, that I don’t identify myself as a feminist. There are a few reasons for this, but the most important one is that I don’t see feminism as something one is, but as something one does. I have often longed for a verb form of feminism, because I would use it all the time. Munn’s many troubling quotes above are not merely post-feminist — her words and ideas are cavalierly anti-feminist. Her repeated assertions, delivered with such disgust and disdain, that the critical discussion of gender and culture is without merit? That’s an anti-feminist action. Now, Munn doesn’t have to be feminist, or even to give a shit about feminism. But demanding the silence of women who feel differently isn’t simply anti-feminist, but anti-woman. Or, as Munn may prefer, anti-human-being. Munn’s panicked defensiveness seeks not to only quiet those who she believes are “bashing†her, but everyone everywhere who wants to have thoughtful discussions about gender and society. That conversation doesn’t stop because one person isn’t interested in it. If Munn feels the way she does, she probably would have been better served to simply ignore the criticism, and then people like me could continue to think of her as a benign compatriot in a male-driven world. Because this isn’t just about Munn; we all have to survive in this culture, and some of us are trying to make it better. Some of us would rather we live in a society where our gender didn’t have some bearing on our success or failure. Some of us would rather live in a society where a woman like Munn wasn’t made to feel pressured and violated into crossing her own personal boundaries, by men who feel wholly entitled to do so. In fact, Munn would have benefited from taking her own advice with regard to the Jezebel criticism, and to “walk it off.â€
“…bitch.â€
Image from nsfmc on Flickr, used under a Creative Commons license.

My dear non-US readers: As with so many of my recapped shows, this series does not seem to be viewable (via legal means, at any rate) for those of you residing outside of the United States. I am sorry, but you are on your own for finding a viewing option that works for you.
Folks are understandably reluctant to give this show a chance.
Certainly, people without an investment in body politics may be on the fence. As I recently noted on Fatcast, one of the common comments I’ve seen has been some variation on: “What is the point of this show?†As though a show with fat people in it who aren’t being worked to exhaustion, heaped with abuse, or drowned in self-deprecating humor cannot possibly have a purpose.
But I’m talking about fat-positive folks, here. My comrade in fatty arms Marianne has expressed concern that the show would let her down, and that is a very real possibility. I watch shows like this not so much with an expectation of greatness, but with an eye toward their greater cultural impact, good or bad. The fact is, this show — or any show, or any book, or song, or movie, or whatever bit of media — is also going to read differently by different people, depending on their perspective. Some things I find hilarious, others will find hurtful. Some aspects I see as complex portrayals of life as an outsider, others see as plainly demeaning or embarrassing. And that’s okay. There’s room for everyone. This show is disarmingly nuanced in its treatment of ideas that are generally agreed upon in popular culture, but it speaks its criticisms softly. It is the best kind of subversive media, hiding in plain sight amongst the chaff of ABC Family’s regular rotation. I keep having these moments where I almost can’t believe they’re putting this on television: I can hear it, but it’s likely that others can’t — because they don’t know how, or because they’re afraid to listen.
We open this episode with letters home from the campers. The most popular subject seems to be the food — mango “is amazing, way better than a regular fruit.†Hey hey now, let’s not start in with the fruit-bashing right away. And what the hell is wrong with the humble apple? Slice that bitch up with some blue Stilton and you’ve got a fantastic lunch.
This episode focuses a bit more on where these kids are coming from, and their relationships with their families. Amber has written something on the order of ten pages to her mom, because they’re “closeâ€. Will is not writing to anyone, but is instead cutting up Chloe’s missing fashion magazine for collage purposes. Dr. Gina Torres is talking to her father in her private doctor-cabin. He wants to know if she’s mentioned his presence there to her mother. Dr. Gina lies and says yes, of course.
Back in the girls’ cabin, Poppy, their deranged-but-well-meaning counselor, has taken on the persona of the “mail fairy†to collect their letters home. This involves speaking in a whispery foofy voice. Becca clues Will to the fact that Chloe suspects her of stealing her magazine. Oh, the magazine she’s currently cutting to pieces? Will says it fell on her bed. Finders keepers! Also, Will says: â€When I see propaganda that I know is destroying girls’ brains, it is my duty as an angry feminist to destroy it.â€
Yes, darlings, you read that aright: a seventeen-year-old character on TV just referred to herself as an angry feminist without using the phrase as self-deprecating humor or as an insult. This is a small thing but it makes me ridiculously happy. But here’s Amber and Chloe to confront Will. “I guess you can’t afford your own magazines,†says Chloe. I seriously cannot wait to see how this show tackles class. Amber attempts to defuse the situation by telling Chloe, “Don’t even talk to her.†“Yeah,†says Will. “Don’t even talk to me.†Will then pointedly takes off her shirt in front of Chloe and stands there in her bra. Y’all, I have never thought of Nikki Blonsky, as her own self, as hot. For one thing, she wears way more makeup than I generally care for. But in the character of Will, she is smoking hot. I mean:
Yowza. After Chloe walks away, Amber pauses to look at Will’s new bunk decor, which consists of cut-out images of classical art showing fleshy women. Will informs her, “It’s fatspiration.â€
HAHA YOU GUYS I THINK I LOVE THIS SHOW.
Back in her cabin, Dr. Gina is trying to compose an email to her mom, but deletes it. I bet this turns into a theme for this episode.
The following day, Jillian Michaels 2.0 is leading the fatties on a brisk walk. Huh. That’s pretty reasonable. She makes a crack about them moving faster to catch the ice cream truck. Ugh. Then she says, “You’re thinking, oh, she’s such a bitch. Guess what? I don’t care.†All she wants is for them to push past their fear, etc. etc. Dudes, where does the prevailing idea that all fat people are afeared of activity come from? Certainly, there are some fat folks in the world who feel this way, but my experience has been that fear of activity is not universal. Indeed, some fat people aren’t afraid of exercise, but just hate it. Others love it. I suppose my point is that I am irritated by the whole “you’re just scaaaarreeedd†assumption; it feels reductive and dismissive.
As they trot along, Ian is telling Will about how he thinks Amber was smiling at him earlier… or at least smiling near him. Will interrupts to ask what he actually likes about her: “I mean, I know she’s pretty, but–†Ian interjects, “Dude, she’s not just pretty, she’s beautiful.â€
Dude, Ian just called you dude. That is not good for your romantic prospects.
Back in the empty cabin, a new camper has arrived to take Caitlin’s place. The New Girl and her family are wearing matching yellow shirts that say “The Dodsonsâ€, but their name is not Dodson. There is a ridiculous story behind this that is funny only to them, which is sort of charming in a wackadoodle way. Dr. Gina is showing them around the cabin when her eyes fall on a large sign beside Will’s bunk that says “Screw body fascism.†I seriously love this show. Dr. Gina gently tries to tell New Girl’s parents they should leave and let her get acclimated, but they offer only genial and vague promises to leave once she’s settled.
The other girls turn up and are introduced to New Girl, whose name is Dani. Everyone except the ebullient Poppy raises an eyebrow at the family’s goofy antics. As her family slips out, Dani’s mom assures her they’re not leaving yet, and when Dani mentions a headache, her mother gives her aspirin with a level of concern out of proportion with the issue. It remains to be seen whether these are just overprotective helicopter parents, or whether there’s more involved here. I expect we’ll find out by the end of the episode, though! Poppy asks the other girls to work extra hard to include Dani, since she’s just arrived and doesn’t know anyone.
Dr. Gina tells Will that she’s received an email from her parents, who would really love to hear from her. Maybe Will could find time to write them a letter? Will shrugs noncommittally. As Dani unpacks, Chloe descends upon her, asking why she is starting camp so late. But when she spies a copy of a book entitled “Phantasma†her entire demeanor changes, and Chloe and Dani instantly bond over their shared love of this book series, which is clearly a Twilight send-up involving ghosts instead of vampires. Hilar. Amber hasn’t read them, and instead she watches the littlest Dodson, Dani’s younger sister, assessing her stomach in the bathroom mirror. Amber has the good sense to appear disturbed by this.
Outside, Dr. Gina is trying to convince Dani’s parents to leave now, but they aren’t hearing it. They mention that Dani has anxiety issues, so they’d prefer to hang out until they’re sure she’s okay. They seem legitimately concerned, and Dr. Gina buckles, again. Oh, they’ll be around this whole episode, won’t they.
At lunch with Becca and Ian, Will expresses her amazement that Dani doesn’t seem embarrassed by her nutty family, who are lunching across the room at a table with several other campers, and who Will says seem as though they’re “from a whimsical children’s bookâ€. It is pretty amazing. Will notes that the best thing about being at camp is being away from her parents, and Ian agrees. When Becca asks him why, Ian says his parents “are both really unhappy people who fight constantly.†Will wants to know if he thinks they still have sex, and Ian hopes not. Turns out Will’s parents do! Loudly! Aw man.
Dr. Gina turns up and announces to the lunchroom that they will have to choose their weekend activities on the lawn. The conversation at Will’s table turns to their shared hatred of team sports. Will says sports are responsible for “the four worst moments of my lifeâ€, and when Ian asks how many worst moments she’s had, Will begins rattling them off. In a cute nod to Hairspray, she mentions being hit in the face with a dodgeball, on two separate occasions. Also included is “getting my period during rope climbing†and I adore that she states this so matter-of-factly in front of Ian. Ian eventually jumps in to note his most hated sports moments, once of which is “being called queer because you hate sports.†He pauses and then says to Will, “No offenseâ€.
UH OH. Ian thinks Will is a gay!
Elsewhere, Chloe is picking up a care package from the mailroom, and seems unexpectedly anxious when they mail-room-lady needs to open it to check for “ediblesâ€. Adding to the confusion is Alistair, a dude camper of whom we’ve seen little thus far (a commenter on my prior recap referred to him as Ian’s “turtley†friend, which is so appropriate and made me laugh really hard), who seems to be showing an unseemly interest in Chloe’s package. The two of them share meaningful looks as Chloe walks away with her edible-free mail. What’s that about?
On the lawn, during the aforementioned weekend-activity-choosing, the campers are to choose between soccer and basketball with Jillian Michaels The Musical, or circuit training with George. Nobody seems to know what circuit training is, but they all gravitate in that direction because they don’t want to spend the next two days being “motivated†by Shay. Chloe teases Amber about her crush on George, and when George appears, he is still calling Amber “Sandraâ€. “You haven’t told him yet?†Chloe asks, both amused and surprised. “It’s too late now!†asserts Amber.
Oh dear, there are too many people in circuit training! Replica Jillian Michaels appears and randomly plucks a bunch of people out of George’s group and redistributes them between soccer and basketball. Will, Becca, and Alistair wind up in the basketball group. FOILED! The trio walks off in search of their doom whilst comparing excuses they’ve used to get out of playing. Alistair used to be able to will himself into getting a nosebleed! That’s handy! One of the things I dig about this show is that even in scenes like this, we are not laughing at the characters, but with them.
There is a brief cutaway shot of some fatties playing volleyball. Longtime readers will recall that volleyball is my sporting nemesis, so it should not come as a surprise that I both recoiled from the TV in horror and thrilled at the prospect of seeing volleyball revealed as the hateful evil torment that it is. No luck, though. Instead, we are circuit training. Adorable jailbait Ian thinks Amber is smiling and waving at him, but she is actually smiling and waving at Dani, behind him. Oooh burn. Ian, please hurry up and turn eighteen so I can stop censoring my thoughts here, okay? Dani’s parents turn up to “observeâ€, and sit watching Dani circuit-train, all smiles.
At basketball, Shay is setting up the teams (by randomly handing out jerseys — no picked-last here). She pauses when she sees Trent wearing a knee brace, and cautions him to stop playing if he feels any pain at all. I am aghast. Shay! What would Jillian do? I’m very disappointed. Once Shay is gone, whooping ridiculously all the way, Trent, who evidently knows his way around a basketball court, takes charge. Off to the side, Will asks Becca if she seems gay to her, “like on a scale of one to Ellen.†Will insists it’s not a big deal, but “hypothetically, what if I want to hook up with a guy, while I’m here?†Trent starts yelling at Will to throw him the ball, but she ignores him. Becca asks, “…like a specific guy?†and Will counters, with great restraint, “Hypothetically.†Trent is now shouting at Will to give him the ball, and so she kicks it. Trent says, in what is possibly the most hilarious line of the episode, “You can’t kick the ball! It’s a foul!â€
The game begins, with approximately 50% of each team seriously into it, and 50% either apathetic or outright terrified of the ball. Alistair catches the ball entirely by accident, and at Trent’s shouting instructions, makes a fey attempt at dribbling it before losing control of the ball, which rolls past Will, who makes no effort to stop it. Trent is enraged that so few players are taking the game as seriously as he does. And here we have recreated pretty much every team-sports experience of my youth, in which the kids who care deeply are angry at the kids who don’t. I actually sort of love this scene because it brazenly demonstrates that some fats dig sports, which is apparently a radical idea.
Post-commercial, we join Trent and Chloe walking along a pond. Trent is still upset and evidently feels like Will thought he was a “dumbass†for caring about sports. This evolves into a monologue about why sports are awesome, while Chloe tries and fails to hold Trent’s hand. Aww. Too bad you’re not shaped more like a basketball, Chloe.
Later, Dani hugs her parents goodbye… except it isn’t goodbye because they’re not leaving! They got themselves a motel room and will be back in the morning. Dr. Gina tries to insist but Dani’s parents again bring up her anxiety, saying they don’t want to get halfway home and then have to turn around and come back. They’ll just stop by in the morning! It’ll be fine!
Elsewhere that evening, Amber stands in line to use the camp payphone, and George happens by, obviously looking for her but trying not to look like he’s looking for her. George, you are like the anti-smooth. He asks if they can talk and tells her he’s just learned that he’s been calling her by the wrong name all this time. Then George apologizes for making her lose her place in the line for the phone, and asks if she’d like to use his cell phone instead, which technically isn’t allowed. George and Amber, sittin’ in a tree…
Dr. Gina happens upon her father in the kitchen, where he’s making tiny blueberry-banana muffins. Dr. Gina observes that they smell “amazingâ€, and he tells her he used oat bran and flaxseed, and applesauce instead of butter. He offers her one, but she shakes her head, and says, with an odd finality: “Actually, I never eat after dinner. Ever.†She flutters her hand around awkwardly when she says it, tacit acknowledgement that this may seem strange. “One measly muffin?†asks Dad. “I can’t,†replies Dr. Gina, seeming honestly regretful. “I’m sorry.†He tells her to take it with her, to eat tomorrow.
And now we get our first window into Amber’s home life, as she calls her mom using George’s cell phone. She is cheerful at the start, but apparently mom is quick with a bucket of ice water, and within seconds Amber is on the verge of tears.
Amber returns the phone to George, who tells her it’s okay not to miss anybody. But Amber does miss someone! George assumes it’s her boyfriend, but before she can answer, the campers are called in for lights out. D’oh.
Dr. Gina tries to compose an email to her mom again, which we hear in voiceover as she types, Doogie-Howser-style. Also, the evil after-dinner mini-muffin is staring at her cruelly from its green plastic plate on the desk, within arm’s length. She cries and fidgets as she writes, and it’s very sad. Ultimately, she deletes this effort like she did the others, and when she reaches for the evil after-dinner mini-muffin, she’s surprised to see it’s already gone. It’s a subtle but unnerving little scene, and the “emotional eating†implication is pretty obvious. I suppose we will be exploring the adult end of food issues through Dr. Gina as the series progresses.
The following day, everyone leaves for their activities while Will hides in the bathroom. She exits to find Dani’s mom straightening up her bunk, and claims to be sick, a lie she maintains for two seconds before admitting she hates basketball. Dani’s mom is unsurprised and calls Will “the artistic typeâ€. She points out that Will’s “Screw body fascism†sign is actually made from cut-out pictures of body parts from Chloe’s magazine. This really is very cool. Dani’s mom says Will’s parents must be so proud, but Will is all yeah, not exactly. Dani’s mom says that coming to the camp was Dani’s idea, and that she thinks her daughter is beautiful just as she is: “You want to support them, but you don’t want them to go through the same pain you went through.†This is an interesting comment, as by being supportive, mom references Dani’s choice to come to camp, but the “pain†she mentions seems not to be the Horrible Woe of Fatness, but the pain of trying and failing to lose weight. The comment makes no sense otherwise, as these two points are posed in contrast with each other. It’s quietly subversive.
Back in circuit training, Dani and Ian talk about her wacky family. Dani says she knows she’s supposed to hate them, but she’s just never felt that way. Ian tells her she’s lucky. Dani tells Ian he’s cute. AWWWW.
Meanwhile, Dani’s family has accompanied Will to the basketball court, where she attempts to slip into the game without Imitation Jillian Michaels noticing. Fail. When she claims she had cramps, psuedo-Jillian is unsympathetic and asks if she’s going to let her uterus control her. Uh, if you think Will is lying, call her on that, but I’d like to speak up on behalf of the Raging Torrents of Blood and Immobilizing Cramps brigade that yes, for some of us, the uterus will occasionally take charge of things. Believe me, I wish it weren’t so. Dani’s family shouts encouragement to Will, which, for some reason, Trent seems disgusted by. He throws the ball to Alistair and walks off the court. Alistair hastily flings the ball at Will and seems relieved to be rid of it. Will catches it, and, at the instruction of Dani’s father from the sidelines, takes a shot at the basket. It goes in! No one is more surprised than Will! She looks around for Trent, but Trent is gone.
Trent is sitting beside the pond writing a letter to his mom. Turns out jock-boy is not so happy about being a jock, and isn’t sure how or why he got involved in sports in the first place, but that he now feels locked in as this sports-playing person when he’s not sure that’s who he wants to be. It’s an interesting little effort at showing how even the people you think are most together and most satisfied in life are often not. Poor Trent.
Does foosball count as a sport? Because I can totally get down with some foosball. Ian and Dani are playing, when Becca speaks up to Ian. She tries to go into the subject gently — “You know how sometimes people will make assumptions about other people?†However, Ian is paying more attention to the game than to Becca, so she blurts out: “Will’s not gay.†Well! Now he knows.
Alistair and Chloe run into each other outside the bathroom, and exchange their 1,000th Meaningful Look of the episode. Immediately thereafter we see them secretly meeting in the woods, Chloe delivering an armful of stuff to Alistair. “Tissues,†says Alistair. “That’s so mom.†They’re SIBLINGS. Whoa, Chloe is kind of a bitch. She hasn’t spoken to him once in front of anyone else. Alistair wants to talk, since they’re alone, but Chloe hightails it out of there. Alistair looks on the verge of tears. I wish I could hug him.
In the laundry room, Will writes a heartbreaking letter to her parents, noting how candidly they demonstrate their embarrassment of her, and how judgemental they can be. But in the end, she tears the letter up and throws it away.
At the same time, Dani’s family finally leaves. Dani joins Amber in the bathroom, and they bond over having sensitive gums. No, really. Amber apologies if she’s acted coldly toward Dani, and explains that she misses Caitlin, who was kicked out last week for purging. Dani is sweet and says she understands, and the two girls hug, after which Amber apologies for getting “zit cream†on Dani’s top. I sort of love that the nighttime scenes all involve the girls putting in retainers or dabbing on pimple cream. Even Chloe sleeps in headgear! Back in the cabin, the headgeared Chloe makes the oft-lamented observation that one cannot take “chub†from one area and move it to another, and Amber reads Chloe’s horoscope aloud. When Amber asks Dani for her astrological sign, Dani can’t be found.
Oh, Dani is crying semi-inconsolably in the shower! I swear, the role of the replacement camper is going to be like Spinal Tap’s drummer. Dani’s parents come to retrieve her, and the other campers are sad and thoughtful to the strains of “Homesick†by Kings of Convenience, a really beautiful song and a personal favorite, which saved this somewhat predictable and hackneyed scene for me.
That evening, Will is practicing basketball alone, when Dr. Gina’s dad (whose name I really should learn) happens along to instruct her. They play together, and the lesson here is family’s where you find it, kid.
Next week: There is an epic battle, though I can’t tell if it’s being played with paintballs or water pistols. The teaser text mentions LARPing, and in it Will declares: “Once you’re dead, you’re out. Unless you become a zombie.†Oh shit, we’re playing Zombie Rules, then? Til next Tuesday.
Note: I wasn’t going to recap this show. Seriously. I had explicitly decided against recapping it. I was only going to write up some generalized thoughts and criticism. But then suddenly a recap was happening.

Those of us who were around when My So-Called Life originally premiered tend to remember it. The show first appeared in late August of 1994, immediately before I was to begin my senior year of high school, and carried on through January, leaving many distressing loose ends that would never be tied up in a second season, as no second season was to come. Even as a sage eighteen-year-old, I took a philosophical view, and one worthy of Angela Chase: it’s, like, this TV show is mirroring my life, where there are always loose ends and where I don’t know what’s coming next and maybe nobody can tell me, and the next season is a mystery because I have to write it still. It was like that. It was that kind of show.
When I see episodes of the series today, I’m always surprised by how irritating and off-putting Angela Chase is to me now, when she was my damn hero back in the day. It’s her awkwardness, her insecurity, her overall teenagerness; some part of me wants to instruct her to stand up straight and speak in complete sentences, for fuck’s sake. I suspect my reaction is partly rooted in the way she reminds me of myself, of how we can all be awkward and insecure and a stupid teenager sometimes, even when we’re supposedly grown up. You build the person you are on the person you were, and that person is always still there, in your head, and in your life, like a corpse surreptitiously buried in the poured-concrete foundation of your current self. Oh, we can all be better, and we can all grow, but we can’t outrun ourselves.
My So-Called Life was more than an hour’s worth of teenaged drama served up weekly; it was a call to morose flannel-clad arms. It was a fragile hug from someone you barely knew. It was therapy. Enough that it has transcended its time to be embraced by kids who weren’t even born yet when it was first on-air. As a story, it speaks clearly and unreservedly to outsiders, and there are few pieces of mainstream media out there that have accomplished this with any success, so it’s not a surprise that My So-Called Life’s single season has been elevated to cult status. Some love it, some loathe it, but most folks I know of my generation have some kind of opinion on it.
We have Winnie Holzman to thank for My So-Called Life, and her formidable capacity for wielding an awkward silence like a massive heart-smashing sledgehammer. Huge, the fat-camp drama that premiered on ABC Family last night, is jointly written by Holzman and her 25-year-old daughter, Savannah Dooley. The similarities between the two shows are apparent: like My So-Called Life, Huge is thoughtful, critical, and occasionally difficult to watch — not because it’s bad, but because it is sometimes very true. Those who were hoping for a series that is identifiably size-positive are going to be disappointed. That’s not this show. However, this is a show that seeks to interrogate cultural ideas and assumptions about the lives of fat teens, and frankly — longtime readers will not be surprised — I think that is a more valuable contribution than a message that is purely and uncritically fat accepting.
I had come to this conclusion even before reading this interview with the writers on the Huffington Post:
Is there a message you’re trying to send with the show?
SD: The thing I really want to stress about the show, it’s really–we’re not doing this show because we are passionate about a story where at the end everyone loses weight and their whole lives are nice. We’re trying to get at the heart of, not the journey of the before-body to the after-body, just the fact that this is an endless journey of these people living their lives. Whether their bodies end up changing or not, their inner changes are what we’re really focused on. People are used to seeing some kind of a clear message–
WH: an easy answer–
SD: –an easy answer at the end. Like “Oh, the chubby girl had a sassy makeover and now really she feels good about herself and her problems are over,” or you know–
WH: We’re asking questions.
SD: What we want to do is, instead of giving easy answers, to raise questions, to challenge people to think about how they relate to their own bodies and challenge them to look at how culturally we view weight and body image.
And so we come to the show.
We begin with a “before” picture. The opening scene of the opening episode of Huge (watch it online) takes place in a sunny field populated by scores of fat kids in swimsuits, lined up to have their first weigh-in and to be photographed. Circumstances aside, the visual impression is kind of outrageously awesome. If this is how things begin, I am wondering whether this is a show that is going to numb you to fat visibility by sheer repetition. These are not a bunch of sad fats wearing coordinated and ill-fitting The Biggest Loser t-shirts and shorts — a costume, really, much like that show would have you believe fatness is a costume, one that simply needs taking off. The fat teens of Huge are individuals.

Nikki Blonsky’s character is Will, outspoken and sarcastic, courageous and flawed. Hayley Hasselhoff is Amber, who is incredibly earnest about dieting and totally unaware of how traditionally pretty she is. These two main characters are opposites in disposition, intention, and even physicality. Whilst awaiting the weigh-in, we also meet Becca, played by Raven Goodwin, who becomes Will’s first friend at camp. It is with no small measure of relief that I can say Becca is not cast as the stereotypical sassy fat black girl — if you’re up for some rage, make a list of all the fat black female characters you can think of and see how many qualify as “sassy” and how many qualify as anything else — but is instead quiet and bookish. When Dr. Rand, played by Gina Torres, approaches, Becca is so anxious to confess that she’s regained all the weight she lost the past summer that the admission explodes out of her. This is the first point at which I wish I could reach inside the television and hug a character: of course you gained it back, dear heart. That is what happens.
At this point, Dr. Rand instructs Will, who’s been standing in line wearing shorts and a t-shirt, to disrobe, as all campers must be photographed in swimwear, for some reason. After a failed attempt by Will to dodge the request, Dr. Rand (who, remember, is GINA TORRES) looms over Will, waiting for her to remove her clothing. And thus Rand/Will shipping is born. Y’all, I don’t even READ fanfiction, and yet I can see the fantasies spooling out on a hundred computer screens as of this moment. Will obliges with what will go down in history as the only striptease ever that I have found to be appealing. She whoops and shimmies and slaps her own ass and OH MY GOD NIKKI BLONSKY I WILL HAVE YOUR BABIES.

Ahem. Sorry. I’ll keep it professional.
The campers get settled into their cabin, and a counselor cheerily informs them that so long as they give up any food-related contraband now, they won’t get in trouble for it. Even gum. Even sugarfree gum. Amber gets to keep her toothpick — girlfriend keeps a toothpick in her mouth, I guess because she’s not old enough to smoke yet — after convincing the counselor that it’s not “flavored”. When the counselor inquires on this note, Will observes: “It’s wood. It’s wood flavored.” This show is surprisingly funny, not least because of Blonsky’s brilliantly sardonic delivery. The campers also must give up their phones and MP3 players, though the reason for this is not given. Possibly so they won’t be able to call for a pizza. Or maybe research has shown that listening to Beyoncé makes you fat. AH, IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW. Beyoncé causes obesity.

Amber tapes some creepy-ass magazine clippings of models above her bunk, some of which aren’t even whole people but just stomachs and thighs. When Will makes a snarky comment, Amber turns and informs her, with extreme disdain, “They’re thinspiration.” Oh, of course. This comment has me seriously conflicted between yelling “WHAT the FUCK, HUGE?” and the reality that yes, most teenagers are likely familiar with “thinspiration” and so this is speaking to their experience in a valid way. To clarify: the concept of thinspiration originates within pro-anorexia communities as a motivational tactic to avoid eating. To further clarify: pro-anorexia communities are groups of folks who identify with anorexia not as an illness to be cured but as a positive and normalized part of their lives and self-perception. Arguably, pro-anorexia is a natural and unavoidable progression of a diet-obsessed culture, but that is another post. Already this show is complicating matters by — however subtly — pointing to the fact that what would be diagnosed as an eating disorder in anyone else is considered perfectly reasonable and appropriate behavior in a fat person.
The following day, the campers (I keep wanting to call them “HAMpers”) assemble on the big open field to meet their coaches. Coach the first is Shay, who will be playing the role of Jillian Michaels for the duration. Obvious homage is obvious. Says Chloe, the camp’s de facto Queen Bee, to Amber, with slavish devotion: “She lives to make people cry. I love her.” Shay yells and references your worst nightmare. There will be exercising. Oh, and she has help, in the form of coach the second, whom she calls “tough as nails”. It’s George, a scrawny, boyishly-handsome dude with emo hair. He looks about as tough as a baby lemur. Amber suddenly develops a thousand little hearts floating around her head at the sight of him. She even removes her ever-present toothpick.
They immediately start the fatties off with a cross-country jog, because what you want to do with your out-of-shape individuals is get them doing the most high-impact activity possible right away, with no regard for pre-existing variances in aerobic fitness or joint health. RUN, FATTIES, RUN. When one fat dude stops to catch his breath, Jillian Michaels Analogue yells at him that “can’t” is not an option, and makes him do twenty jumping jacks. Because what you want to do with your person needing to catch his breath is make him do further intense activity. You know, I was concerned that maybe this show would not speak to the large percentage of sick fucks in America who derive fetishistic pleasure from seeing fat people being “punished” and pushed past all healthy limits of comfort and safety. I’m so relieved that the sick-fuck population is being acknowledged.

(In fairness, I don’t think this tiny scene is presenting this kind of forced-death-march exercise in a totally uncritical way. I presume most of what is happening here is setting the stage for the rest of the series. Thus I shall soldier on, applying the benefit of the doubt.)
At dinner, the campers are unthrilled by their vegetable-heavy meals. I am choosing to believe they’ve been prepared inadequately, as carrots and spinach are both perfectly capable of being delicious. When Chloe observes that Amber is “the slowest eater I’ve ever seen”, Amber says that she chews every bite thirty times. Uh, I hope we get some more overt analysis of the whole eating-disorder angle here at some point, because otherwise this shit is going to make be really uncomfortable. The table is impressed. Amber may even skip dessert! But it’s okay, Will volunteers to eat it.
Amber says, in a voice positively saturated with judgment: “Are you sure that’s a good idea?” Suddenly it’s like everyone who ever said those words to the teenaged me is onscreen and speaking to me from the past. I heard that shit in regard to diet granola bars and apples, kids. Nobody ever thinks it’s a good idea for a fatty to eat. Will states that if she’s going to gain weight at camp as planned, she needs to commit from day one. Ha. Oh, Will, don’t ever change.
After dinner, Caitlin has sussed out Will’s secret and basically asks for a hook-up. Will subsequently sets up shop in a bathroom where she sells her contraband. I imagine it’s meant to be funny, and to highlight Will’s efforts to sabotage the camp, but it mostly makes me uncomfortable, because it’s playing semi-uncritically to the stereotype of the overeating fatty.
Next up, we have a Sharing Circle. Ian, played by Ari Stidham, tells a story about seeing himself in a mirror next to his school’s “fat kid” and realizing with horror that they were the same size. Oh hi, I could tell that story too; I imagine a lot of fat kids can, and thus it’s a very real and cutting scene (watch it on YouTube here). To shift away from the emo moment, I am compelled to note that throughout my viewing of this episode I kept hoping the actor who plays Ian is at least eighteen, because I think he’s seriously hot, and if he’s not eighteen I’m going to feel very dirty about that. Can anyone confirm or deny dude’s legal status?

The following scene does little to stem my possibly-immoral attraction to Ian, when Will discovers him playing guitar in a boat and they subsequently bond over their mutual love of the Pixies. FACT: at seventeen I would have been madly in love with a guy like Ian: cute, knowledgeable about music, plays guitar, funny. Actually, now that I think about it, I knew a few Ians back then, and I was by turns madly in love with all of them at one time or another. I think we are witnessing the birth of Team Ian right here, my friends. As they walk back, Ian confesses that he was scared to talk to Will, because he thought she was “too cool”. When Will asks why he’d think that, he says, “Well, you did that dance the first day…?” We don’t get to hear the rest because Amber appears to tell Will oooooooooh she’s in trooouuuuble. Poor Ian is obviously smitten with the stunning Amber (thoughout this show, my husband kept saying of Hayley Hasselhoff, “She is GORGEOUS,” with a mixture of disbelief and awe) and it’s hilarious.
Dr. Gina Torres has somehow (MYSTERY!) discovered that Will has been selling food. She stodgily threatens Will with eviction, but doesn’t carry it through, giving Will the chance to quietly ditch the hooch before the heat turns up.
Later that evening, the dude campers sit around a TV in a common area, watching a football game. Becca wants to watch a different show, but is afraid to ask. So Will does it, and the boys pretty much ignore her. Within seconds, Chloe, Caitlin, and Amber appear and ask if they can change the channel. The boys capitulate immediately, ostensibly because these are the prettier, traditionally-feminine, and smaller girls. It’s a heavy-handed display but it makes its point clear. Even at fat camp, the pretty ones rule. One of the boys invites Amber to sit on his lap, and this is clearly not something Amber’s considered possible before. She lowers herself gingerly, as though she expects to crush him — or as one does when approaching a Porta-Potty one does not want to touch any more than is absolutely necessary. She sits. He doesn’t die! It’s a wildly relatable moment for probably anyone with an awareness of weight, which is to say everyone.

Walking back with Chloe and Caitlin, Amber is amazed that she sat on a dude’s lap. She’s never had this experience before. She does what girls do and inquires if she did it right, if she should have flirted more. Caitlin tells her not to get tied down the first week: “Remember, this isn’t like the real world. You could seriously have any guy here.” Amber says, disbelieving: “This is so huge.” HA! Puns for the win. Chloe seems annoyed by all the attention Amber is getting. I am sure nothing will come of this over the course of the series.
Back in the cabin, preparing for bed, Amber wants to know if she looks thinner. OY. Eventually Will confronts her, insinuating she ratted Will out to Dr. Gina Torres about the food-selling. Amber super-bitchily tells Will she doesn’t care what Will does and instructs her to get over herself. Amber goes back to scrutinizing her body in the mirror. As Will gets into bed, she gets this vicious look as though she is plotting to murder Amber’s whole family. Or, you know, to shrink her shorts.
OH HAY she’s shrinking Amber’s shorts! Hot water wash! Becca is concerned and says it’s “too mean”, but Will assures her it’ll be “hilarious”. Suddenly Caitlin bursts into the laundry room with an urgent look, and Will supplies her with some junk food she’s evidently buried at the base of a tree on the property. When Will asks whether Amber knows about Caitlin’s black-market binges, Caitlin says yes, and that “she’s a good person.” Will looks dubious.
Later, the campers are running an obstacle course and, predictably, Amber splits the back seam of her shorts. It’d be less humiliating if she weren’t attempting to scale a wall, and if Gorgeous George the coach weren’t supporting her bum at the time. Amber runs off, scandalized and embarrassed, and George follows. I’d like to add here that I think obstacle courses are the funnest things ever and I wish I knew of one locally I could go run right now. George and Amber bond over awkward moments: George is deaf in one ear and tells an embarrassing story of his own. I suppose this explains why he keeps getting Amber’s name wrong. There’s a brief moment in which it seems like they might kiss, which WOOHOO INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT WITH A CAMPER! But they both pull back before anything happens.

Amber returns to the cabin in notably higher spirits, but this doesn’t last long: Caitlin’s stuff is gone. Evidently someone informed Dr. Gina Torres that Caitlin had been purging, and it turns out that Camp Victory isn’t bulimia-friendly. The rest of the girls are shocked and upset. So am I! I really liked Caitlin! There is much raging against the Camp Victory machine as Amber says: “I thought this place was about helping us. Couldn’t they have given her counseling or something?” When Will suggests that maybe it’s better the problem is out in the open so Caitlin can get help, Chloe tells her ominously: “You don’t know anything. Home is the last place she should be.” Amber implies this is Will’s fault for supplying Caitlin with food to throw up; Will retaliates by climbing up to Amber’s bunk and ripping down her thinspiration pictures. Amber yanks Will off her bunk and they struggle on the floor for a bit when Dr. Gina Torres enters and demands answers. A bunch of the girls are crying. The intensity continues as Will hyperventilates in the bathroom. Becca tries to put an arm around her but Will instantly recoils. She says she can’t stay there, and she’s busting out tonight. This is a tremendously heavy scene, thick with all the questions and confusion and helplessness that tend to surface with eating-disorder revelations. Even though they don’t all get along, there is an unmistakable camaraderie amongst these girls, bound together by their fat, and so the loss of one of the group is painful to everyone.
Will, on her way to freedom, stops by Ian’s cabin to return his mix CD. I’m presuming the scene in which he gave it to her was cut, though the day before we did see Will listening to a CD player in the cabin. This is a grand opportunity for me to lament the unfriendliness of MP3 players to sharing mixes. Now, why the campers would be relieved of iPods but allowed to keep CD players is beyond me. I am willing to suspend disbelief for this brief moment of recalling the beauty and tenderness of that ritualistic exchange of mixtapes with people you liked (and people you liked-liked). I’m not sure if this scene is really supposed to be romantic, but it hits my brain as basically the most romantic thing ever. Will tries to return the CD and Ian smilingly tells her she can keep it for longer if she wants. Then she tells him she can’t, because she’s leaving. Ian’s smile evaporates and he looks confused and distinctly disappointed. “Well,” he says, “I’m on Facebook.” LOL. Team Ian.

Will vanishes into the night and nobody really notices, except for Becca, who can’t stop crying. Finally Amber gets it out of Becca that not only has Will run away, but that Becca feels responsible because she was the one who ratted her food-selling activities out to Dr. Gina Torres. Becca says she didn’t want Will to get in trouble, “but I just couldn’t take having that stuff around anymore.” Jesus, y’all, how insane is it that we have freaking children sobbing about seeing food they’re not allowed to eat? It’s just food! We as a culture are so fucked up. In return, Amber admits that she was the one who told about Caitlin’s purging, thinking she’d get help, instead of getting kicked out.
Will turns up at a diner, where she instructs the waitress that she will start with fries and a chocolate shake. In an unexpected subplot, Dr. Gina Torres comes in as well, and sits down at a table with the camp’s new cook, who turns out to also be her dad. They seem to have a troubled relationship. I’m sure this won’t have any bearing on events in the rest of the series.
When Will realizes Dr. Gina Torres is in the diner, she tries to make a quick exit but is foiled by a waitress who loudly asks if she still wants her french fries. Busted! Again. Dr. Gina Torres tells the waitress, in a patient and disappointed-parent voice, with regard to the fries: “She does.” Will comes back and sits down, and Dr. Gina Torres sits down with her. The doctor surmises that since all the buses have stopped running, Will plans on hitchhiking, “which means you’d rather risk your life than change it.” Good morning, reductive reasoning and oversimplification of some complex circumstances! The hell of it is, weight loss is never simply about eating less and dropping pounds, and anyone who says different either has no relevant experience on the matter or is living a life of extraordinary privilege. It is about pressure, about negotiating the boundaries of what we want and want other people want for us. It is about the constant coercion to just do it, just lose weight, because culture and people we know and people we don’t all say we should, and everyone just knows that, and your individual experience and mine, and what you want and what I want, and what you know and what I know — none of it matters in the rush to fit a standardized ideal. Losing weight will not change you: if you hate yourself as a fat person, you will hate yourself at any size, until you address what’s within and not just what’s without.
Dr. Gina Torres tells Will to eat her fries before they get cold, and Will refuses. Dudes, I wouldn’t eat under that Judgy McJudgerson stare either. I have known so many women in my life who were unable to eat in front of people, because they were ashamed to be seen consuming food, and imagined that anyone who saw them eating was judging them for doing so. Of course Will won’t eat. Will asks why she should change, “because my parents are embarrassed of the way I look?” Dr. Gina tries to get tender and quiet-voiced, saying she knows Will is scared, but Will stops her: “I’m not scared. I just think everything you stand for is crap.” Beat. “No offense.”
Back at camp, the doctor is calling Will’s parents, who tell her to go stay with her uncle. Damn, this poor kid. While Dr. Gina talks on the phone, Will watches the girls in her cabin a little ways off get ready for bed. Though the over-arching purpose of fat camp may be not much fun, there’s something to be said for the rare opportunity to engage in some fat comradeship with people who understand a piece of you. Poor Becca looks lonely.
When the doctor gets off the phone, she looks wistfully at the railing outside the cabin, carved all over with campers’ names and initials. One that stands out says “DR 1985″. Dr. Gina Torres says, “I remember the day I carved that. I wanted to go home so badly.” REDEEMED FATTY REVELATION. Will tells the doctor she wants to stay, and she “vows” not to sell food anymore. Whether she’s staying because she’s decided to lose weight, because she wants to feel the fatty love, or because this joint is simply preferable to her uncle’s place, is unsaid. Inside the cabin, Amber eavesdrops on their conversation.

Will reenters the cabin to an overjoyed reception by Becca, to whom she tells an elaborate lie about being dragged back to camp against her will. Becca is basically my favorite. Amber is trying to sew up her split shorts, and Will semi-apologizes. Then she asks Amber for a toothpick. NO WILL NO. Will says: “I’ve only been off sugar for three hours and I already feel like defacing public property.” She asks Amber if it gets easier, and Amber’s look says no.
Soon it’s lights-out, and Amber whispers to Will in the bunk below: “It never gets easier. But you start wanting it.” What she’s referring to is not specified. You start wanting… to lose weight? Or the heady sensation of being hungry all the time? Hunger makes you keen as mustard, and there’s almost an adrenaline rush to it — I remember craving that feeling in middle school, that trembling and electrical nervous insanity that meant it had been far too long since I’d eaten anything, that gratification of being able to punish my horrible body for failing to look the way I wanted it to. You want food, body, I know: fuck you.
Somehow I doubt that this is what Amber means. But it’s what I thought about.
Will whispers to no one in particular that she should have eaten that chocolate shake when she had the chance. She and Amber discuss the exact parameters of the lost shake in whispers, with a reverent ardor, like prayers before bed. So ends the day, and the episode, both rife with missed opportunities.
Now that Will has pledged herself to Camp Victory’s bosom, where do we go from here? If next week’s trailer is any indication, Will wants to know if she seems gay, “like on a scale of one to Ellen,” Amber unwittingly threatens Chloe’s reign as fat camp queen, and her mutual attraction with George draws some attention.
Miscellany: A tale of first-class flying, a new Fatcast, and a Huge game-changer.
By Lesley | June 24, 2010
On our flight back from Los Angeles, a red-eye arriving in Boston at 5AM, I wrangled a couple of heavily-discounted first class upgrades. For the past, oh, six years or so, I’ve only flown Jet Blue, an airline so delightfully egalitarian that it does not have a first class. For this flight we took Virgin America, because the airfare was markedly less expensive. So here I am to report on flying-while-fat on Virgin America. In coach, it is just okay. The seat pitch — that’s the space between your seat and the seat in front of you — is heinously ungenerous. The flight out to LA was pretty dire for this reason. Also, our plane was really warm, and loves, I’m here to inform you that the one place you don’t want to be overly warm is crammed into coach seats on a six-plus hour flight. A positive: the arm rests on the aisle go up, so I was able to give my long-suffering middle-seat-taking husband a little more space by curling up sideways and letting my prodigious ass encroach into the aisle a bit.
That was the coach flight out: cramped, hot, and in the pinnacle of ridiculous complaints, the in-seat TV channel selection was terrible. Do I need four channels of ESPN? No. You give me E!, but not the Discovery Channel? Bad form.
The first class flight back was a different story. This first class experience was one of the silliest and most self-conscious traveling exercises of my life: the amount of privilege first class passengers get is cuckoobananas. You get your own security line, away from the plebians flying coach. We weren’t checking bags, but I understand first class passengers get to check two for free, and the weight limits are higher. You get to board the plane first, at which point your own special first-class flight attendant starts plying you with free food and beverages approximately every twenty seconds. Then you get to relax and resist feeling smug while all the coach people file past you to their seats, peering at you curiously like one might at a goldfish in a really luxurious fishbowl. All the on-demand movies that coach passengers have to pay for are free (and you’d better believe I watched the first thirty minutes of three stupid movies just to feel like I’d taken full advantage of this). But let’s get down to brass tacks on the coach vs. first class debate, shall we?
Coach people fly like this:

And first class people fly like this:

Marianne and I have recently (and humorously) talked about the unpredictability of seating standards and the randomness with which they are applied. I may have made a completely offensive analogy in which I asserted that a skinny person “wasting” seat space whilst a fat person suffers hip bruises and/or public humiliation is like someone taking a plate full of delicious freshly-made food and throwing it in the garbage in front of a starving homeless person. (See, if you listen to Fatcast, you get to hear the hilariously inappropriate and/or problematic things I edit out of my writing here.) So while all the other privileges and entitlements of pretending to be rich were amusing, I was mostly interested to experience the difference in seat size. For awhile now I’ve suspected that airlines aren’t truly interested in anyone’s comfort. And why would they be, as companies concerned with turning a profit, people’s comfort is not within their purview. Airlines are, in fact, invested in skating the very edge of the amount of discomfort a person will tolerate and still continue to patronize their business. You can see where they’re constantly testing boundaries — charging more for exit row seats, checked bags, and so forth. Thus, the “extra” space of the first-class seats would not be ultra-luxurious in any other context; it’s simply that we’re so accustomed to suffering varying degrees of discomfort on a plane that first class seating looks like a night in the Honeymoon Suite, comparatively speaking. Was I more comfortable? Absolutely. Would first class be worth the full price of the ticket? Not to me, not unless I had money to burn, or my airfare was being paid for by someone else. The thing is, I neither need nor want all the frou-frou perks of first class flying. It ain’t my scene. I’d just like a little more room at my seat. How difficult is it, airlines, to allow folks a little more room at their seats?

On the subject of travel, there is a new Fatcast, long overdue, and it’s part two of our conversation about fat travel, in which we discuss other travel-related topics including packing, being photographed, and the fat-friendliness of a travel destination particularly close to my own heart. Earlier this week we recorded an episode about exercise, and we are done being out of town for now, so hopefully we’ll get back to the regular release schedule.
On a related note, remember those Fatcast promotional flyers I mentioned here a month ago? There’s a printable .pdf version available here, in case any of y’all want to spontaneously form a Fatcast street team. If we had merch, I’d promise you some. Hmm. Maybe we should have merch.

I was pointed at this Q & A with Huge star Nikki Blonsky by a Twitter follower, and it’s inspired my expectations of this show to upgrade from Blunt Cynicism to Cautious Optimism. One quote from Blonsky about the show:
“Huge†is groundbreaking because it has never been done before. I don’t think there’s ever been a full cast of plus-size people before. Now there is and kids can tune and say, “Hey, those people look like me and they’re going through the same issues I’m going through.†In this show, we don’t just deal with, “Oh, let’s go jogging and swim 20 laps and lose 30 lbs.†It’s not about that. I mean, eventually as you watch the show, you’re going to forget it’s about a weight-loss camp. You’re just going to get so invested in the characters. We deal with everything from eating disorders to body issues to sexual orientation to everything that every teenager is going through right now.
As I’ve recently noted, shows featuring casts with multiple fat people are extremely rare, and that’s probably the aspect that interests me the most about this show. But I am also impressed with the self-awareness above — the acknowledgment that hey, this is pretty unique, and by extrapolation that a show about exercise and weight loss exclusively (cough) is less interesting than a show about characters.
But that ain’t all:
There’s been some chatter on blogs about the fact that everyone on “Huge†in plus-sized. From my point of view, as a blogger, I see people wondering if the show is going to stereotype women of size. How, as someone on the show, do you make sure you’re not perpetuating stereotypes?
The thing is, everybody forgets plus-size people are just people. We’re people! We. Are. People. We have the same feelings, we deal with the same issues that people who are a size 2, a size 4 and a size 6 are. We go through relationship problems, we go through friendship issues, we go through everything. Breakups, make-ups. Every single issue skinny people go through, plus-size people go through, too. We’re all human beings and we have to remember that our looks are something that are only with us for a certain time. It’s our spirit that people will remember us for as time goes on and we grow older.
I’m actually looking in the mirror right now and I know that in 10 years, I won’t look like this. I’ll look 31, not 21. So I think people will just become so invested in our characters and what’s going on in the show and what’s going on in the characters. They’re not going to really even be noticing that we’re plus-size, other than the fact we look more like your neighbors or the people you go to school with, rather than the fake facades of what Hollywood has said everybody should look like. Nobody really looks like that, unless you have the means. Most of America doesn’t have the money to have a trainer 24/7 and a meal service to bring you meals, because if they did, we’d all be a size 2. And that would just be too perfect.
I think this show, you’re really going to see the heart of America. I think that’s what TV is lacking and I’m so glad we’re going to fill that void.
Huh. How about that. You can read the rest of the interview here.

Say hi, Rufus!
There’s something unavoidably surreal about being recognized in public as this… blogger. Recent conversations elsewhere have pointed out how the anonymity of the internet promotes bad behavior and plain old stupidity, but it also has effects that are less obviously negative. Even when one is using one’s real name, there’s no way to truly visualize the faces of the people reading. When last I checked, this site gets a couple thousand unique visitors a day: I can’t even begin to imagine what a thousand people might look like. This makes it easy for me to write out and share fairly personal stories without feeling too exposed. What is a couple thousand people, a couple thousand brains reading? I have no idea. I can’t get my head round it.
The surreal comes in when I am met in public, face-to-face, with someone who reads these words. Because in that moment I realize this person knows an awful lot about me, and I know nothing about them. It’s an odd sensation, not unpleasant, not frightening, just an illuminated reality: all those IP addresses have living people behind them! People who recognize me. People who want to say hi.
More and more lately I’ve found myself being approached by strangers who simply want to tell me how much they like what I write here. I’ve worked hard over the past six months or so to become better at real-life recognition. I am annoyingly reluctant to accept compliments, and I’m striving to improve that. Now when a stranger compliments me, I force myself to shut my mouth, to listen without being dismissive, and to say: thank you. The exchange may still be awkward — and believe me, loves, if you feel awkward and weird approaching me, know that I feel awkward and weird too — but it’s an awkward I can better live with, and an awkward that doesn’t involve me compulsively swatting down compliments in a dismissive panic that diminishes us both by suggesting your opinion is irrelevant and my work here is valueless. I TRY NOT TO DO THIS ANYMORE. The best interactions are the easygoing ones. The easygoing ones are the ones in which folks approach, confirm that I am who they think I am, and tell me they read and/or enjoy the things I write here. Then we may or may not exchange some pleasantries before parting ways. Don’t be surprised if I am slightly graceless or inelegant at accepting praise; don’t think you’ve done something wrong if I stumble through the conversation. It’s not you: it’s me.
But it’s important to say hi, nevertheless.
This weekend, I was sitting in the stands at roller derby with my husband when a woman introduced herself as a reader and we had a brief (and slightly nervous on my part) chat. Last night, I received a comment here from someone who had spotted me at LAX prior to my flight back to Boston on Thursday (oh, I have considered recapping my Los Angeles trip here, but am not sure if it’s too far afield, topically-speaking) but who chose to not approach. Now, it’s true that I’m not at my best in an airport — as discussed extensively elsewhere, I am not fond of flying for a few reasons, so I am likely to be less than chirpy and outgoing in these circumstances. But having mulled it over this morning, I think I’d always prefer that folks do approach rather than not, for one simple reason: it makes us visible.
Meeting and talking — however superficially — in three dimensions about the body politics this blog purports to discuss generates a tangible visibility that many of us don’t get to experience very often. I’d wager very few of y’all have scores of friends with whom you can candidly and critically talk about the cultural impact of body standards and expectations. Some of you do! And that’s fantastic. But many don’t. So taking an opportunity — even if it’s strange and hilarious — to connect with me off-blog has an impact, on both of us and on the environment in which said meeting takes place. It can be subtle, for sure, but simply by making an approach you’re being demonstrably critical. And being critical is good for you — for your self-esteem and for your brain.
Thursday of my Los Angeles trip was spent with Joy Nash, who is herself eminently recognizeable as the brains (and beauty) behind the Fat Rant videos, and among the many subjects we discussed, we had a great conversation about being identified in public. LA is supposed to be fat-person-free, more or less, but I tend to see fat people everywhere, probably because I’ve developed a habit of actively looking for them, whereas fat folks are mostly invisible to people who don’t make efforts to see them. We talked about the charge you get when you see a fat girl in a dress, or otherwise presenting herself in a way that draws attention — it’s like recognizing kin, and in a thinner city like LA, these moments of recognition are especially precious, as it’s so easy to feel alone. In my goth days I cultivated the ability to spot goths (or other music-based subculturals) even out of goth attire based on tiny signals: slightly unusual makeup, specific shoes, other accessories — even the way they’d walk, or move their hands. I’ve often wished fats shared this type of circumstance-spanning nonverbal language, so that we could spot one another in cities across the country, in the most random and unexpected situations. Not even to talk, necessarily, but to share a silent camaraderie, to know we are understood.
So in all honesty: when you see me and approach and introduce yourself, I am usually just as happy to meet you as you are to meet me. Because you are amazing. Really. If your purpose is to tell me that you think I’m amazing, I’m humbled and happy that you think so. I’m moreso of both if things I’ve written or done have meant something to you, or changed your thinking around, or helped you overcome some of the self-hating garbage we are all forced to carry around inside our heads. But you are the one who made the connection, who set out to introduce yourself, who took a chance: you are the amazing one. What I do — or attempt to do — is provide you with an instrument, or a channel, through which you can investigate these ideas and then begin to change, to shed a lifetime of cultural pressure, to criticize a world that limits bodies to narrow standards or acceptability, to know yourself. What you have done is just as hard as what I have done, and so you deserve just as much credit, and I wish I could tell every person whom I meet this without it sounding ridiculous and sentimental and cloying. But seriously: you have done something amazing. It’s not me. It’s you.
Hello loves: the blog will be unusually quiet this week as tonight I am [anxiously] (fat-)flying to Los Angeles for three days, where the husband will be attending and reporting on E3 and I will be visiting museums and hopefully meeting up with a few far-flung West Coast friends, including the inimitable Joy Nash. Though I’ll likely be Twittering to my usual standard, I do not expect to have time for proper writing while I’m gone.
In the meantime, there is a new Fatcast for you to hear; it is part one of Marianne’s and my conversation about Fat Travel, appropriately enough. Part two has been recorded, but sadly I haven’t had time to edit and upload it yet. As an aside, my inner perfectionist hopes the audio quality is improving! I learn more with every podcast, but I’ve still got a ways to go. Thank you, as always, for your feedback: we’ll be doing a listener-mail episode soon, in which we also tell humorous stories about things we’ve broken with our fatness, as folks seemed to warm to that idea.
If you’re all caught up on Fatcast, do mosey over to check out another new podcast being perpetrated by my beloved Cynara (co-livejournal-moderator and occasional poster on this blog under the handle stitchtowhere) and Jenny, whom I know a bit from Twitter and Livejournal. The podcast discusses pop culture and can be found at Fatties on Ice. Both individuals involved are brilliant, sassy, and smart-mouthed people so my expectations for awesomeness are high. I’ll be listening myself tonight, during my interminable flight, in hopes that their clever commentary will transport me off the airplane and into a magical fat-unicorn playland, where donuts grow on trees and everyone has their own personal tuffet to sit upon, precisely sized and engineered for maximum ass-comfort.
To finish things on a totally off-topic note: tell me your favorite traveling music, if you have an opinion on such matters. My ultimate travel songs are things like Gogol Bordello’s excellent “Wonderlust King” (embedded above), or if I’m feeling less effusive, Magnetic Fields’ “Born on a Train”. But given that I am making my first! ever! trip! to California I find myself playlisting more location-specific options. Will I be able ramp up my nerdiness in order to listen to The Decemberists’ “California One” whilst driving on the road it references? I can hope.

Golda at Body Love Wellness has the first of a three-part interview with Kai Hibbard, former finalist on The Biggest Loser, a show which I have recently disparaged on this blog:
You get poked and prodded by complete strangers and nobody will tell you a single thing about what’s going on. And that point was where I really believe that the dehumanization process started, where they start teaching you that because you are overweight you are sub-human and you just start to believe it. Through the whole process, they just keep telling you, over and over, how lucky you are to be there. You’re being yelled at by people [whose] job is basically to keep the ‘fat people’ in line and you start to believe it. (Source)
I won’t lie: it’s always gratifying for me when I talk about something — say, the dehumanizing effect a certain reality show has on fat people — and then somebody else comes along and says the same damn thing.
In the interest of full disclosure, though she may be anti-Biggest Loser, Kai is still very pro-weight-loss, and may be shilling diet pills. So, grain of salt.

Natalie of Definatalie.com has words for you on the subject of personal growth in Confessions of a Former Snarker:
I did not change my mind overnight. No, I am pretty stubborn. I take after my Dad. The fight I put up was drawn out and dirty and took place over months. I denied that my snarky behaviour was anti-feminist, I denied my racism, and I denied my privilege. Smart people, who really did not owe me anything and were not obligated to educate me, offered me links and discussed things with me but I stood my ground. No sir, I was not going to back down. But after a while, months even, things started ringing true. Making fun of people, who were mostly female identified, began to feel like I was part of the system of oppression that keeps women down. That didn’t feel good at all, but I COULD NOT GIVE IN!
People change, and it’s amazing. Everyone does it, though as Natalie notes, we often make it harder for each other to grow by holding on to outdated expectations of people. Social justice is a process. Culture jamming is a process. Activism is a process. Self respect is a process. None of these ideas are straight paths to a finish line; none of them are going to just happen and be over and then we move on to something else. It’s not a matter of gaining membership to a club because you know the right passwords and secret handshakes. Activists need to live in the world if we’re going to change it; we need to recognize and respect shifting ideas and experiences rather than assume that anyone is a hopeless case. Natalie shows the way.

Oh look, Huge has a trailer. It’s not embeddable but you can watch it on the show’s Facebook page. The clips include Nikki Blonsky stripping off a pair of pants to reveal a swimsuit with an athletic vigor worthy of a burlesque performer, Hayley Hasselhoff’s gorgeousness, and lots and lots of fat bodies. Y’all, this show makes me so nervous. My primary concern is that it’s going to follow the familiar territory of fat people acting out because they secretly hate themselves, which is depressing and boring and really not very interesting to watch. I expect that a series set at a fat camp is doomed to be uninspiring on the body-positivity front, but I hope to be wrong.

In Fatcast news: I have fallen behind on editing. I apologize. It began with an allergy takedown over the weekend, and every night this week I have been busy elsewhere. But I expect to post episode 8 — part one of another two-parter on fat travel — tonight. Until then, go look at the art Amanda Chronister made, inspired by our “clap your hands if you believe in fatties!” exchange.

Finally, in Lesley’s Cattiness Corner: Courtney Cox was quoted this week talking about how playing “Fat Monica” on Friends was “freeing.” Dude, I know. Actually being fat instead of just donning it as makeup is totally freeing as well, what with the unicorns and all. That’s the part that landed this on my feed reader, but it’s not what annoyed me about her comments. It was this:
In a new interview with The Los Angeles Times, Courteney Cox reveals that while shooting Friends with Jennifer Aniston, they lunched together every single day for 10 years.
“And we always had the same thing — a Cobb salad,” she says. “But it wasn’t really a Cobb salad. It was a Cobb salad that Jennifer doctored up with turkey bacon and garbanzo beans and I don’t know what. She just has a way with food, which really helps. Because if you’re going to eat the same salad every day for 10 years, it’d better be a good salad, right?” (Source)
Apparently this was already common knowledge to fans of the series; I am not one. What annoyed me wasn’t the idea of eating the same lunch every workday for a decade — that’s just terrifying. Nor it is the implication of eating as an unpleasant necessity that happens exclusively to replenish nutrients and fuel — that’s kind of sad. I’m sure some folks out there eat the same lunch every day and like it fine, but for me, I think the room Fat Satan has reserved for me in hell probably features this kind of mundane joyless eating ritual as punishment.
What annoyed me is that she seems not to know what makes a Cobb salad: lettuce, tomatoes, avocado, cheese (blue or Roquefort), hard-boiled eggs, bacon, and chicken breast, all finely chopped together. With all that, a Cobb salad is about the last salad on this whole damn planet that needs “doctoring”, and even if it did, you don’t “doctor” a Cobb salad with bacon — it’s supposed to have bacon. Personally, my favorite-ever Cobb salad came from the cafe at Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts (surprising, I know); the Brown Derby replica restaurant at Disney Studios in Orlando is said to reproduce the original 1940s version, but I’ve had theirs and didn’t much care for it. Too many eggs, and the liquid from the chopped tomatoes made the lettuce and bacon, which should be tasty crispy counterpoints to the other ingredients, soggy and unpleasant. You can read the (likely apocryphal) story of how the Cobb salad came to be here.
I realize this is ridiculous. But every once in awhile I have one of those moments where I need to remind myself that words mean things.
The Cobb Salad image above was taken by wickenden and is used under a Creative Commons license.
Madonna, Lady Gaga, and Breaking the Male Gaze: A Close Reading of “Alejandroâ€
By Lesley | June 9, 2010
The idea of the “gaze†as a broad psychological concept beyond the simple meaning of the word comes to us from Jacques Lacan, a French theorist (a psychoanalyst, really, but we won’t hold that against him) most influential in the mid-20th who was really very interested in how we look at things. Like many giant brains, Lacan is largely inaccessible and not useful to normal humans going about life, and though his long-term culture-seeping influence is both broad and deep, for our purposes here it’ll suffice to say that he really got folks using the term “gaze†to discuss how we look and how we are looked at, in and by the world.
A few decades later, along comes another giant brain called Laura Mulvey, who writes a seminal work in feminist film theory entitled “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema†in which she posited the idea of a gaze that was specifically male. Basically, Mulvey’s damage was that film (and, by extension, we can argue the whole of mass media even today) is produced from a perspective that is almost always male, and that we as an audience of media consumers are thus trained to see ourselves and the world through this “male gazeâ€. By Mulvey’s reckoning, women being captured in this gaze are valued primarily for their ability to be looked at, and to be pleasing to behold according to established modes of heterosexual attractiveness. Furthermore, Mulvey argued there are two ways in which the male gaze sees women: as madonnas or whores. You’ve probably heard this part before. The male gaze, basically, is the idea that nearly all media is produced using this standardized way of looking — even women look using the male gaze, because that is the default.
Before I completely lose y’all in sticky theory, I’ll provide a straightforward (if very simplistic) example. Ever notice how the women in Cosmopolitan magazine so often look like they’re a hair’s breath from an orgasm? This goes for the ads as well as the editorials. Have you ever wondered: hmm, isn’t it sort of weird that a women’s magazine that is itself sold to women and is simultaneously trying to sell things to women should be filled with other women staring out of the pages making the kinds of dull-witted sexyfaces you’d expect them to be making at men whose attentions they were seeking? Why are women being instructed to look at women who are ostensibly looking at invisible men? The magazine is showing you women via the male gaze. The magazine is also training you to see yourself via the male gaze, and to put more currency in how you look to the outside observer, or how you look in a mirror, as opposed to how you look at the world, as a person seeing. The message is that women don’t see; they are only seen. You want a man? You wear these clothes, stand in this posture, make this sexyface: these are the symbols of the straight female. In a heteronormative, male-driven world, this what it means to be beautiful, or at least sexually available.
The point being, the male gaze is ubiquitous in our culture. Think of this: people allow Michael Bay to make movies. When Michael Bay makes a movie, he is looking with his asshole eyes and that asshole-infused vision is what lands on the screen, and normal folk like you or me (well, not me, but still) buy a ticket to go watch Michael Bay’s Asshole Extravaganza! filmed entirely in GLORIOUS ASSHOLE-O-VISION. When we sit in the theater, we can’t pry the camera from Michael Bay’s asshole hands. We can’t shift the view from what he wants us to see. As with all mass media, we are but passive receivers.
In case it was not yet obvious, I am of the opinion that this male gaze — which can, indeed, be perpetrated by women as easily as men, since we’re all thoroughly trained in its function and use — has a negative influence on our culture. By focusing on women as primarily objects to be appraised and displayed, it contributes to narrow and unrealistic cultural beauty standards, a favorite topic on this blog.
Yes, my most beloved and patient readers, we are finally getting to the damn video.
Today, pop star and constant source of bemusement Lady Gaga released the much-anticipated video for “Alejandroâ€. The comparisons with Madonna are inevitable, inevitable enough that it’s probably fair to read this video as an homage to the David-Fincher-helmed video for “Express Yourself†rather than as a rip-off. Madonna, too, made a career out of toying with the male gaze, and though some will no doubt put Gaga’s video down as unoriginal, the reality is that there isn’t a pop star alive today who does not stand on Madonna’s well-sculpted shoulders, and anyone who claims otherwise is seriously deluded.
This post will be comparing “Alejandro†and “Express Yourself†exclusively — a fuller comparison of Madonna’s and Gaga’s bodies of work would require a book’s worth of writing and research, and I just ain’t up for that today, y’all. (Indeed, even my reading of “Alejandro†here, beyond its comparison with “Express Yourselfâ€, is less comprehensive than I’d like, but this seemed like enough words for one day.) Let us begin, then, with a quick reading of “Express Yourself†(embedding is disabled for some stupid reason, so you’ll have to hop over to YouTube if you need a refresher). This video tells a pretty linear story about Madonna, who is married to/enslaved by/otherwise the property of the monocle-wielding owner of a factory that seems to only produce greasy oily dirty young men. And rain. Madonna hangs out at home in her underwear while the factory workers do push-ups, poke at machinery, and nap on metal bunks. You know Madonna’s husband/owner/monocle-wearer is bad because he’s balding and wears a prim suit and keeps her chained to a bed. The conflict comes in when Madonna’s kittycat escapes. Oh no! Luckily one of the factory workers, a winsome and muscular lad with long floppy surfer hair, finds the rain-drenched feline in the workers’ barracks. He pets it for a bit (oh hardy har har, Madonna) before taking the elevator upstairs and returning the cat to Madonna, who just happens to be hanging out in bed, bare-ass naked. Madonna’s all OH DEAR MY MODESTY! Downstairs in the factory, the mens are fighting, like, for fun, as the factory owner watches. Suddenly Sir Monocle notices that one of the workers is missing! I bet he’s having sex with your wife! And he totally is! As Madonna and the factory boy copulate, the greasy oily dirty-dirt gets all over her romantic satin sheets. The end.
Madonna is perfectly capable of portraying herself as a powerful being with a boatload of independent sexual agency, but in this particular video we don’t see much of that. Thoughout the story she is trapped in Monocle’s tower, and even when she is “rescued†by the cat-toting young man she isn’t allowed to actually leave captivity: she just gets the awesome privilege of having sex with a stranger who wandered into her room. One could possibly argue that Madonna is using the young man to assert her independence from Monocle, but if that were really the case the event would have much greater import if she’d been the one to instigate sexual contact, as opposed to being the object at first modest, then passive, and then mildly responsive to the stranger’s advances. The whole video really doesn’t do much to counteract or confront popular ideas about women’s sexuality. At its core, this is really dull cuckolding porn. Madonna’s relationship with the camera (and therefore with us, the audience) bears this out — she stares and smiles and pouts and smirks at us through lowered lashes, inviting us to look, appraise, and come closer; she’s into it, even if she says she’s not.
As videos go, this one is not especially brilliant, with one exception. The most interesting part of “Express Yourself†is the brief sequence in which Madonna dresses in drag — sort of, as she wears a suit with a lace bra under it, which she repeatedly thrusts out of the suit jacket, because ladies in male drag are only sexy to the mens if they can still see their tits — and briefly wields the monocle herself. Madonna’s monocle-dance ends with the semi-infamous crotch-grab-and-finger-gun combination (HELLO PHALLUS!), which was pretty damn shocking at the time, but not because we’d never seen it before. Before we accuse Lady Gaga of cribbing too much from Madonna, we should also note that this entire routine borrows so heavily from Michael Jackson as to border on the absurd. Madonna’s crotch-grab was shocking, scandalous even, because we’d never seen a woman grab her crotch like that before.

Lady Gaga’s “Alejandro†is directed by Steven Klein, a fashion photographer (remember the infamous “Domestic Bliss†photoshoot with Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt in W, before they were officially a couple — that was him) and longtime Madonna collaborator and friend. Klein doesn’t consider himself an artist, in spite of having done numerous gallery exhibitions, and I tend to appreciate this self-awareness, as Klein’s work tends to lack both soulfulness and connectedness in favor of producing things that are just vaguely interesting to look at. I don’t mean this as a slam; I think a lot of what passes for art is just vaguely interesting to look at, without a real text underneath, and that’s okay. We live in a postmodern age.
Some weeks ago, Lady Gaga said of “Alejandroâ€:
The video is about the “purity of my friendships with my gay friendsâ€, Gaga had explained, earlier. “And how I’ve been unable to find that with a straight man in my life. It’s a celebration and an admiration of gay love – it confesses my envy of the courage and bravery they require to be together. In the video I’m pining for the love of my gay friends – but they just don’t want me.†(Source)
“Alejandro†lacks the linear narrative of Madonna’s lost-kittycat story, though much of the imagery is clearly evocative of “Express Yourselfâ€. The opening sequence, prior to the music’s start, features military men in fishnets and heels lounging languidly at cocktail tables surrounding a small stage, and pays heavy dues to Cabaret, even as it casually swaps the beautiful girls of “Wilkommen†for beautiful boys. This video is very gay. More than that, later on, it’s very queer, which is a different animal from gay, although the two ideas may be anatomically compatible.


We pick up vaguely where “Express Yourself†leaves off, though the factory seems to have been converted to a military installation. Instead of Gaga being held captive in a strategically-lit penthouse, she’s holding the monocle. Rather, the monocle is strapped to her head, but whatever. Gaga’s lad factory has exchanged rain for gentle snowfall. Meanwhile, there is a funeral procession, and, in a choice that is painfully dull, Gaga carries what looks like a heart wrapped in barbed wire (shaped like an “Aâ€, naturally) and studded with nails. Are we burying Alejandro? Or are we burying Gaga’s love for him? Who knows. Show us more Monocle Gaga!

That’s better.
As noted above, this isn’t a video that tells a story so much as it creates a scene, or a series of scenes. Most of these scenes involve barely-dressed men, either engaging with each other or engaging with Gaga. One of the video’s recurring visuals features a large room with several institutional-looking twin beds and on them, men in little black underpants and impressively tall heels hanging on to ropes and writhing in the same manner as women in music videos typically do. In a dramatic departure from the bedroom scene in “Express Yourselfâ€, Gaga, wearing black thigh-high stockings and unstructured underwear that nearly matches her skintone, is the sexual aggressor. She is indeed so very aggressive that in several shots she assumes traditionally-male positions for intercourse, including being straddled by one of the men, and thrusting against another from behind in a reversal of the standard arrangement. I won’t lie, y’all: I LOVE THIS. Whereas Madonna’s bedroom antics were couched in oops-I’m-naked hetero-porn convention, Gaga will put her fake penis in your ass. She will. And you will enjoy it. While cavorting with these dudes, Gaga gets thrown around herself quite a bit, but it’s never with the same reluctance and uncertainty of Madonna and her greasy stranger, and Gaga’s struggles are balanced by the fact that she shares the upper hand, as often as not. Instead of being content with the random man who happens to come upstairs to fuck her, Gaga comes down to fuck everyone on her terms. In heels. There is nothing coy or modest in these exchanges; Gaga does not bat her eyelashes nor give us a single cautious sideways glance. If she is looking at the camera, she meets it head-on, daring us to look back.


Some of this video is uneven, and some of it borders on silly. The religious iconography is confusing, even though it’s very typically Madonna — I presume the idea is that Gaga is living like a nun because she can’t have sex with her gay male lovers, as mentioned in the quote above, but it seems a bit literal and heavy-handed given that the military imagery is so much stronger. The rifle-bra making an appearance later on is a hilarious bit of absurd one-upmanship over Gaultier’s cone bras. Furthermore, the Moe Howard hair on the solider boys is a little inexplicable (Gaga’s similar hair may indicate her solidarity with the men, and that she identifies with them, but they could have accomplished this with any hairstyle).
Finally, in the last few minutes of the video, Gaga appears to reprise Madonna’s drag, and yet her version is less straight-guys-will-think-this-is-hot and more ambiguous. Specifically, Gaga dispenses with Madonna’s lacy REMEMBER-I’M-A-LADY bra and instead wears a buttoned-up black vest and pants. While Madonna’s baggy suit looks calculatedly as though she is wearing her man’s clothes for a lark, Gaga’s drag ensemble actually fits her. Let’s look at that sentence again, shall we? Gaga’s drag fits her. Because in the end, it’s all drag for Gaga, isn’t it?


Certainly, Lady Gaga has influences, and it’s clear that Madonna is one of them. Pop music is itself derivative, and Gaga’s derivations are managed so fluidly and with such expertise as to border on the meta. But I’d argue that for all its similarities to “Express Yourselfâ€, “Alejandro†is a less a copy or even an homage than it is a revision. Madonna identifies and aligns herself as a straight woman, and truly, though I know Madonna has dabbled in hot girl-on-girl action both public and private, her engagement with lesbianism — if you’re willing to even call it that — has always seemed intended to make her sexier to the male gaze, in the storied “two hot girls getting it on is hot†sort of way. Gaga, on the other hand, can writhe and hump a football team’s worth of scantily-clad men and we still aren’t totally sure about her. Madonna’s sexuality could be scary because it was intimidating; Gaga’s sexuality is scary because we don’t quite know what it is.
Have we ever seen Gaga make an obvious blank-eyed sexyface? Pout girlishly? Hell, it’s rare that Gaga is even filmed from above, another common factor of the male gaze: when we see someone onscreen, people filmed (or photographed) from below, so that we are looking up at them, tend to look powerful, intimidating, larger than life. Being filmed from above, so the audience is looking down, tends to denote the opposite. This is a part of our unspoken visual language. Women, especially women meant to look sexy and vulnerable, are often filmed from above, but Gaga rarely is. (One notable exception is the miserable crying-girl persona of the “Bad Romance†video, which I’d argue is explicitly intended to exploit the looking-down view for satirical purposes.) While Madonna is rarely portrayed as legitimately vulnerable in her videos, when she plays at vulnerability in her videos of the “Express Yourself†era it’s obvious that she’s doing just that: playing. Madonna exploited the male gaze — even when she was subverting it, or taking the piss out of it — and her portrayal of sexuality was clearly influenced by established, if risque, ideas of what makes for sexy from a straight male perspective.


Like “Express Yourselfâ€, Gaga is the only woman in the video for “Alejandroâ€, but where Madonna used a video full of men to imagine how they were looking at her, Gaga uses a video full of men and encourages us to look… where? Possibly at the men, to see them as she does? (In truth, Gaga’s fondness for odd eyewear has often led me to wonder if she’s secretly reading post-structuralist theory in her spare time.) In “Alejandroâ€, Gaga creates and recreates her own (queer) gaze, her own sexuality, her own sexyness, which may or may not be appealing to the sensibilities of straight men at large. Even the multitudinous crotch shots of her prior video “Telephoneâ€, which I’ve defended elsewhere, are so overt and confrontational as to go beyond gratuitous and venture into territory that is downright alien until they make us uncomfortable. Which should be impossible, given the sheer number of ladies’ crotches we see in pop music every day, but Gaga’s visibility is different. We don’t know how to parse it. IS Gaga sexy? We don’t know. Where Madonna’s sexuality tapped gently at the edges of propriety so we could giggle and gasp at light bondage while also feeling slightly titillated, Gaga’s sexuality is terrifyingly ambivalent insofar as it frequently refuses to engage with the dominant male gaze. It’s hardly surprising that there would be rumors that she may or may not have a penis. A woman who refuses to engage with the male gaze cannot be a woman at all.
“I love the rumor that I have a penis. I’m fascinated by it. In fact, it makes me love my fans even more that this rumor is in the world because 17,000 of them come to an arena every night and they don’t care if i’m a man, a woman, a hermaphrodite, gay, straight, transgendered, or transsexual. They don’t care! They are there for the music and the freedom. This has been the greatest accomplishment of my life- to get young people to throw away what society has taught them is wrong. Gay culture is at the very essence of who I am and I will fight for women and for the gay community until I die.†(Source)
Without Madonna to prepare us, Gaga wouldn’t be where she is. Without Lady Gaga, some future pop star will never be inspired to seek a spotlight. It’s just pop music, when you get down to it, and “Alejandroâ€, while catchy in an Ace of Base sort of way, by itself is not going to make many lasting waves in popular culture. But the video has something; it’s trying, maybe occasionally succeeding, in breaking the traditional, heteronormative male gaze. When Madonna looks into the camera, she’s watching an audience, real or imagined, watching her; she’s watching herself. When Gaga looks into the camera, she is challenging us, confronting us. Gaga isn’t simply watching herself; maybe Gaga is watching us. Maybe Gaga is watching the world.
This post originally appeared on fatshionista.com, where an extensive and in-depth discussion in comments still resides.
Video: Megan Carter brings some body diversity to So You Think You Can Dance
By Lesley | June 3, 2010
EDIT, 6/7: The video clip above has been removed from YouTube because apparently fair use is dead. But check the comments for a link to a clip that’s still up.
I love but one reality show in all the world; that show is So You Think You Can Dance, the equally exhilarating and tear-jerking dance competition series. I love it for a few reasons, but primarily because it is a showcase of people who are intensely passionate about their art, an art that is unlikely to ever gain them fame and fortune on a level with those who would shrill and croak their way onto American Idol. I also love it because it is the only television show in my lifetime history of watching television shows that reliably makes me cry every time I watch it. More often than not, anyway.
I have a weakness for dance, it’s true; as a kid I worked my way through every last one of the old Hollywood musicals carried by my local video-rental joint. I began with Fred Astaire but as I got older I only had eyes for Gene Kelly, whom to this very day can set my heart aflutter, particularly in An American in Paris. Cyd Charisse used to say that when she got home at night, her husband could always tell if the film she was working on had her dancing with Fred Astaire or with Gene Kelly — if she came home covered in bruises, it would have been Gene. That’s a delicious little story, isn’t it?
But I digress.
So You Think You Can Dance, like all these talent-based competitions, begins with a series of episodes that collect the most interesting (note that I did not say “best”) auditions from their various stops around the country. Among them, there is always a fat dancer. At least one. The context varies. Typically the fat dancer(s) exhibit vacillating degrees of badness. There are terrible fat dancers who arrogantly believe they are amazing; there are humble fat dancers who obviously love what they do but who are nonetheless terrible at it. Arrogance is met with irritation from the judges; humility is met with delicately-worded but honest criticism, punctuated with encouragement. Sometimes the fat dancer is “inspirational”, for whatever reason. But they are never good.
This season, the fat dancer turned up during the New York auditions. It’s fairly obvious when Megan Carter steps onstage that the judges — who decide who progresses on to the torment of “Vegas week”, from whence the finalists will emerge, bloodied and battered and hating life — expect little of her. But when she dances, she surprises them.
The thing is, good dancers make what they do look effortless. That’s how you know they’re good. That’s why so many people turn up to audition who are patently horrible: because they have seen good dancers who made them believe that they could dance that way too. This is part of how dance affects an audience; by demonstrating incredible feats of movement, it makes us believe in beauty and possibility.
Megan Carter gets up and makes it look easy. Watch the video clip above if you doubt me. The reactions of judges Adam Shankman and Mia Michaels* are what make it all the better, until Nigel comes and throws cold water over everything by bringing up the ugly truth that fat dancers simply don’t get jobs. When confronted with this reality, Megan says she’d like to change that.
Unfortunately, Megan does not make it through the choreography round this time, but she’s young yet, and unlike many talent-based reality shows, this one encourages those who don’t make the cut to come back and try again the next year. Here’s hoping we see her again in next year’s auditions. In the meantime, Megan’s ably demonstrated that size is not an obstacle for her, and that’s refreshing for all of us to see.
—
* How is it that when Mia Michaels says “woman of size”, she makes it sound so grand? I swear, anyone else on earth uses that phrase and I roll my eyes, but Mia says it like a damn benediction.
Ohio State University: ‘OBESE’ BMI DOES NOT HARM CURRENT HEALTH OF YOUNG ADULTS, STUDY SAYS
Brant Jarrett, of Ohio State University, one of the researchers, said: “There is a myth going on. Our findings show being overweight is no different from being what we believe is a healthy weight and this is across a person’s entire lifespan… Don’t worry if you are overweight. What is all that stress and dieting doing to your body? Probably more damage than the extra 15lb.
“Being obese before you are 40 has no correlation to your health either. The risk that people are told about does not exist.†(Source)
From another article covering this study:
Among the over-forties obese people were significantly more likely to be taking medication for a health problem related to physical factors (as opposed to mental conditions, which were removed from the statistics). Even then the difference between norms and fatties was barely bigger than that between men and women – women are much more likely to be on medication than men are.
In fact, normal-BMI US women over 40 are almost as likely to be on medication as obese-BMI men: the proportions are 57 and 61 per cent respectively. It would seem that simply being female is pretty much as bad for you – and as expensive for society to pay for – as being a fat man. (Source)
Surprise! Now y’all know I’m not hugely invested in these sorts of studies; too many of them are funded by people and organizations who are invested in a certain outcome, and if you’re inclined to argue that !SCIENCE! is always bias-free, then you and I find ourselves at a crossroads. I’m always interested in outcomes like the above, however, because it does fly in the face of our all-consuming conventional wisdom on the subject, and let’s be frank: nobody profits via a result like this, whereas lots of people (diet-pill manufacturers, commercial diet plans, WLS surgeons) can profit by results showing that fat = imminent death. While that doesn’t necessarily make the results discussed above more true, it does make them interesting.
Sadly, while some researchers will likely leap at the chance to test this theory, it will take many years and many more studies before these notions trickle down to mainstream culture and everyday people, who are secure that they things they already know must be true simply because everybody just knows that. I also find it curious how this is a study out of a major American university and the coverage seems to be happening primarily in the UK. Could it be that we in the US are so invested in obesity-epidemic handwringing that we can’t handle criticism? Hat tip to Big Fat Blog for the heads up.

Women and body image: a man’s perspective
When his girlfriend has a meltdown, and says she hates her body, that is not a simple concept. Unlike men, women do not have a simple relationship with their bodies. They have a complex relationship with their bodies. This is what men often don’t understand. When it comes to their bodies, women are extremely vulnerable – and, what’s more, lots of people take advantage of that vulnerability. This makes the situation worse.
Men don’t have to contend with this – the hair people, and the make-up people, and the fashion people, and the shoe people, and the bra people, and the nail people, and the eyelash people, and the Botox people, and the cosmetic surgery people, and the perfume people, and the hair-removal people. Oh, and the diet people.
This is an insightful, well-researched and thought-provoking article, written by a man, about trying to understand women’s body issues on their terms and not his own. I had a(n ostensibly male) commenter earlier this week who said, in part: “I do not buy the concept that the fashion world parading skinny women up and down the runway sets a standard that sane women are trying to achieve. If it were true, being obese would not be an epidemic in America. The opposite would be true.” The comment made me both chuckle out loud and wonder how many women this guy really knows. He could take a lesson from the gentleman who penned the article above: chicks ain’t the same as you. Whether that makes sense to you is irrelevant; women’s bodies are cultural currency in a way that men’s bodies are not. This is the way of the world.
Oh, mens.

The amazing Frances of Corpulent has had her fantastic post, “Obesity really is disgusting,” about a new study analyzing social attitudes toward fat people, reblogged on Jezebel.
Not much to say here but hooray, so here is a snippet:
In general, the social groups rated most negatively and with the highest levels of disgust were those perceived to have an element of personal control over being a member of that group. Obese people were among the most negatively viewed groups, on par with homeless people (which is incredibly problematic, but that’s a rant for another day) and politicians. The only groups rated as more negatively and as more disgusting were drug addicts and smokers.

There have been two new Fatcasts in the past week, one on language and “safe space”, and the other on questioning reality. You can listen online in the usual place or subscribe via iTunes or using your preferred method of podcast-grabbing. Upcoming podcasts will talk about fat travel (this is a two-parter), and we’re going to assemble some listener questions for a minisode. So if you have questions, fire away! You can email, comment, or use our new Fatcast-specific Formspring page.

And now for something completely different: remember my teenage-outsider memories post of a week or so ago? Want to hear some music (not involving covers of The Murmurs or Violent Femmes) by my open-mic-night enabler? Mr. Alex Nelson has an album you can buy; I have done so and can thus offer an enthusiastic personal recommendation to those of y’all who enjoy music.



Two Whole Cakes is a blog written by 

